Some History and Perspective on
Search and Rescue Dogs in
By
Warden Specialist Deborah Palman
MESARD Founder and Training Director
Oct. 2005
Prior to the
1980’s the only type of dog teams utilized to look for lost persons in Maine
were police K-9 or bloodhound tracking teams that followed the ground scent
left behind as the person traveled. In
Washington State during the 1960’s and 1970’s, Bill and Jean Syrotuck developed training systems for dog teams that
relied on searching for lost persons using the air borne scent of a person
rather than the ground scent. Based on
their systems of training and the deployment of teams, the American Rescue Dog
Association (ARDA) was formed by a number of search dog units that trained and
deployed German Shepherds using Syrotuck’s methods of
training and search planning. Due to
the excellent leadership of these units, the ARDA name became associated with a
high level of competence in search and rescue. ARDA certified units were not just a
collection of teams that worked at the direction of some other authority – they
came to a search equipped and prepared to plan and run searches themselves for
at least a week at a time.
Jerry
Sukeforth of Sukee Kennels
in
In
1981, about the time the Pine Tree Unit was dying out due to lack of call outs,
a statute was passed that put the Maine Warden Service in charge of inland
SAR. Selected Warden Supervisors were
sent to National Association of Search and Rescue (NASAR) training on how to
conduct and manage searches, and the use of air scent ARDA trained dogs was
emphasized and praised in all the training.
Warden Service used ARDA teams on a few of their massive searches, most
notably the search for George Wescott outside
While
the original MESARD dogs were mostly German Shepherds, other qualified handlers
and dogs joined the team with other breeds and the group decided not to become
an ARDA certified unit because ARDA required that all the dogs be German
Shepherds. ARDA standards also required
that the unit be capable of providing their own logistics and planning for the
search, functions that were largely fulfilled by the Maine Warden Service search
organization in the state of
Although not an
ARDA unit, MESARD adopted testing standards that were similar to ARDA
standards. MESARD recognized the success
that ARDA groups had using standards with the multiple field tests: a trail
search, a dense brush search, a night search and large area search. MESARD was incorporated in 1984 and trains
both air scent and tracking dogs to this day.
During the 1990’s, disagreements between MESARD and Search Dogs Northeast
over dog team standards eventually led to the writing of the Maine Association
of Search and Rescue (MASAR) standards for search and rescue dog teams. The MESARD standards were changed to
accommodate the testing additions imposed by the MASAR standards.
MESARD
has provided SAR dog services to the Maine Warden Service at an average of
about 20 searches a year and has many finds of victims to their credit. A large part of the unit’s success was its
attention to the proficiency of its dog teams and its adaptation of ARDA
training methods to the thick and heavily wooded terrain of
Most
ARDA units worked in the relatively open woods and areas of the western US, or
in farm country or the open hardwoods of the more southern latitudes were
handlers could see their dogs while they were working. The first MESARD dogs were certified
according to ARDA standards and trained with the “find/refind”
alert method. With this type of “alert,” or indication that the dog has found a
person, the dog finds the victim, returns to the handler and then returns to
the victim. Handlers’ recognized the
change in their dog’s body language and/or relied on the dog’s “come hither”
stop and stare or eye contact to know that they had to follow the dog. In open cover, the handler can see the dog
leave the immediate area of the handler and make a long run to the victim, so
often the handler knew when the dog first hit the scent of the victim and
left.
Experience
searching and training in the thick woods of cut over areas and conifers of
eastern and northern Maine as well as extensive night searching made it clear
to the experienced MESARD handlers that simple “eye contact” or body language
reading would not work in search environments where the handler could not see
the dog. Dog teams are usually assigned
to search areas where ground searchers and aircraft are ineffective because of
reduced visibility, so, at actual searches, MESARD teams usually ended up
searching areas with reduced visibility.
MESARD
handlers also began to select dogs from working lines instead of show or pet
genetic lines. Working dogs are bred to
work and are easy to motivate, work longer and harder and show more
independence and energy when searching than pet or show lines. They are far superior for searching than
non-working dogs, but they tend to range farther away from the handler and
thus, when actively searching, cannot be seen in conditions of low visibility.
MESARD training
methods were changed to teach the dog a trained alert that involved the return
of the dog to the handler and physical contact with the handler or a return
with an obvious soliciting behavior like barking to signal that the dog has
found a victim. The proofing of the
alert behavior made searching when the handler could not see the dog much more
effective and became the foundation of all MESARD air scent dog training.
To
some extent, the success of MESARD air scent teams and Warden Service K-9 teams
in finding victims since 1990 has made Warden Service search planners rely on
them more and more. Dog teams have
become a little too trusted because not all dog or police K-9 teams are as highly
trained nor experienced at SAR as the Warden
Service and MESARD teams. Most wardens
don’t know the difference between a dog that follows ground scent (tracking
dog) and an air scent dog, so they don’t understand that each has specific uses
and limitations. Wardens also don’t
understand SAR dog certification requirements and what is needed for SAR dog
teams to be effective. Well meaning but
less reliable dog teams that are not certified in SAR functions are treated by
most wardens as being as good as SAR certified teams when sometimes they should
not be relied upon.
Unlike tracking
dog handlers who start a track and either find the victim or don’t, air scent
or area search dogs are assigned areas to search and clear. Using a bomb dog to search a school to
determine if a bomb threat is real is an analogous situation to an air scent
dog searching an area. What is important
is how reliably the team can say the victim or bomb is not there and force the
search or situation to progress to new areas.
The easiest solution occurs when the team finds the victim and the
search can stop. When an air scent dog
team searches an area and does not find the victim, search managers then have
to make a decision about the effectiveness of the team and whether or not the
area should be searched again by another search resource. Since MESARD and Warden Service dog teams
have been so successful in finding victims, and air
scent dog teams are so efficient compared to ground search teams in clearing
areas, most Warden Service search planners will not immediately re-search areas
covered by air scent dog teams. In
searches involving massive areas of wild land, it is highly likely that areas
searched by dog teams will never be searched by another resource before the
search is terminated. Because of their
real life search experience, MESARD dog teams understand that they may be the
only search resource working their assigned area, so they train and search with
the understanding that they may the victim’s only hope.
Understanding
how crucial the SAR dog resource in
Along with
standards development, MESARD adopted a Code of Ethics and rudimentary
“procedural” polices that address team conduct at searches and the call out and
use of certified and uncertified dog teams.
These policies were often discussed, agreed upon and adopted by the
membership after a problem developed between members or with a team’s
performance. Regarding the use of
certified teams, initially MESARD policy stated that only certified teams could
respond to SAR incidents run by Warden Service.
The policy did not address the use of member dog teams by authorities
other than Warden Service, some of which worked at the direction of other law
enforcement agencies. However, a recent
incident involving an uncertified MESARD dog revealed the weight that wardens
and search planners place on the performance of MESARD teams. Since some search planners don’t even know
how dog teams work, it is really up to the responding dog handlers to
understand and control their deployments according to their capabilities. During the summer of 2005, a MESARD handler
using an uncertified tracking dog unknowingly created a problem at a search for
a lost nursing home patient. The patient
was 40 years old did not have any major physical problems, but he was brain
damaged with the mental abilities of a four year old and unable to care for himself. He escaped
the home by climbing out a window. The
nursing home called the local police and they called the MESARD handler, who
had previously used her certified MESARD tracking dog to track under the police
department’s authority. In this case,
since it was a missing person, Warden Service was also requested, but it took
some time for wardens to respond.
Since her
previously certified dog was deceased, the handler used an uncertified dog that
she had started training to replace the other dog. The dog ended up running a 5-mile track that
was “continued” another half mile by a newly operational State Police team. The wardens running the search trusted the
first handler because she was a MESARD handler, so they gave up the search for
the night and assumed the lost person was OK.
Fortunately, the weather was warm at the time. The next day a more experienced Warden
planner and an experienced Warden K-9 handler responded and assessed the
situation. They were both a little
skeptical of the tracking dog results but the planner allocated the majority of
his resources to search out where the track ended. Luckily the Warden Service K-9 handler
elected to start his tracking dog back at the nursing home. He successfully tracked the patient out into
the woods only a half-mile behind the nursing home. The man could not get up or walk by himself by
the time he was found, having been without water or food for 20 hours in hot
and humid weather.
This
incident pointed out to MESARD how much trust is now placed in dog teams. The MESARD policy was modified to prevent the
use of uncertified dog teams where search managers may rely upon them, whether
or not they are deployed by MESARD, Warden Service or another authority.
MASAR is also
considering SAR Unit standards that will require each Unit to control the
actions of their members and keep untrained or unqualified members from
deploying in situations they are not qualified for. The use of dogs to locate human scent is
unique and not a use that someone who has not trained a dog for SAR can
intuitively understand, so it is crucial that SAR dog handlers police their own
ranks.
Another
training and deployment change that has come since the original ARDA training
is the use of GPS units in Maine SAR.
Warden Service now relies heavily on the use of GPS units to plan
searches and keep track of what areas have been searched and what have not. GPS units allow for better navigation and allow
search managers to know exactly what searchers have done. GPS use has eliminated the confusion caused
by searchers trying to locate unfamiliar area boundaries in the dark in areas
unfamiliar to search teams and planners.
Planners can give starting coordinates or even enter search area
boundaries directly into searcher’s GPS units.
When searchers are done, their routes are downloaded into the planner’s
computers and the planners can see directly what has been covered and what has
not been. New roads and other points of
interest can be recorded with GPS units and added to the data needed to conduct
a search. Because of this extensive GPS
use at Maine SAR scenes, GPS use and training is required for MESARD certification. In addition to the overall use of GPS units
for search planning, GPS use makes covering and navigating within a search area
much easier, and there is no better way to record a tracking dog’s track and
route of travel.
Although
not included in certification requirements for air scent teams, in training all
MESARD dogs are exposed to cadaver scent sources to test their reaction so the
handler can know if their dog avoids, is attracted to or is neutral towards
cadaver scent. This allows the handler to
know how the dog might react if the victim they are searching for is deceased,
a situation that may or may not be anticipated when a search starts. Some advanced MESARD teams formally train in
cadaver work and provide assistance to the State Police, Warden Service and the
Medical Examiner’s Office in searches for human remains.
MESARD
teams also train and certify in water search and searches for evidence or
articles with human scent. Besides
helping to recover personal items of the handler, MESARD dogs have recovered
car keys, pagers, radios and GPS units for members and others and assisted law
enforcement agencies with evidence searches.
The skill of locating articles with human scent can be crucial to the
recovery of items left or lost by a victim and provide valuable clues to the
victim’s route of travel even if the victim is not located.
MESARD
dog teams provide a valuable service to the people of the state of